FAQs & Selected Resources


Who created this website?

Individuals who monitor white supremacist organizing in New England. See you in the streets!

Table of Contents

Why do you focus on public demonstrations?

We focus on public demonstrations because public events are moments when white supremacists and their ilk come into the open, seek to recruit new followers, strengthen working relationships, and claim public space and sanction. These demonstrations expose both who is organizing and regularly expose their true ideologies, regardless of messaging around “free speech” or similar buzzwords.

Table of Contents

Why do you focus on individuals?

Historically thru the present, exposing and naming white supremacists directly and unequivocally in our communities is one of the most effective ways to demoralize them and decrease public support for their activities.

Table of Contents

Does exposing white supremacists give them more power?

No, while there may be a temporary media flurry that puts their names in lights, ultimately white supremacy and related ideologies thrive when they are considered harmless, marginal, or fringe. When we understand and expose them for who they are, the weak cover stories evaporate and they are less able to organize effectively.

Table of Contents

What about other forms of white supremacy?

White supremacy (as part of racial capitalism) forms the fabric of US social, economic, and political life. It shows up institutionally in the form of prisons and police, gentrification and displacement, genocide and land theft, hunger and poverty, educational disparities, and so much more.

It is important to understand how state and non-state forms of white supremacy interact and support each other: while Patriot Front openly says they want to push out immigrants, housing developers enact that vision by building luxury apartments in immigrant neighborhoods.

Table of Contents

What about people of color in these groups?

Black, brown, and/or Latinx people – primarily men – make up a visible minority in some white supremacist organizations, including the Proud Boys. These people of color may be attracted to the Christian traditionalism, misogyny, anti-communism, or nationalism of these organizations – individual and collective reasons will vary. We observe that in general, people of color within white supremacist organizations are pushed to the front to shield the organization from critique, diverting the public from the ideology and relationships these groups hold.

Check out these for a more in depth look at this topic:

Table of Contents


Irony poisoning

Irony poisoning is a tactic of using the often ironic detachment of internet meme culture to introduce bigoted ideologies in a socially “acceptable” way. This takes a variety of forms, for example, “ironically” saying “Heil Hitler” in an online chatroom, making misogynist or racist jokes, and so on frequently enough the participant ceases to notice the offensive statements. Then, more developed ideological statements are introduced slowly until the participant is drawn in to the ideology and eventually adopts it.

Table of Contents

Dog whistling

White supremacist organizations use a variety of dog whistles to divert attention from the overtly racist parts of their ideologies and agendas. We list two of the most frequent dog whistles below – “free speech” and “pride.”

“Dog whistles use language which appears normal to the majority, but which communicate specific things to intended audiences. They are generally used to convey messages on issues likely to provoke controversy without attracting negative attention.” (Wikipedia, Dog Whistle Politics)

Other common dog whistles included: pro-life, gun rights, back the blue, and property defense.

Table of Contents

Free speech

White supremacists organizations regularly invoke and enjoy “free speech” as a protection for their incitement toward genocide. Flat or absolutist understandings of free speech necessarily pave the way to complicity with bigotry.

“The strategy of free speech absolutism has seemed to suffice over the last fifty years, but that is not because it works per se. Rather, in a post-World War II, post-civil rights world, most (albeit not all) Americans collectively decided not to tolerate blatant unabashed bigotry — that is what kept nefarious ideologies like white nationalism at bay. But cracks are now showing in this shared public commitment. And free speech absolutism will not save us from this — if anything, it will only make matters worse by allowing intolerance to fester, to proliferate, and to garner momentum. In this sense, free speech absolutism is akin to laissez-faire approaches to economic policy: Both seem to promote unadulterated freedom (after all, what could possibly be more free than a completely hands off approach?). But any system that entirely forgoes standards or regulations will ultimately result in atrocities, infringements on other people’s rights, and the consolidation of power in the hands of a few.” -Julia Serano

Table of Contents

Pride – straight, white, civic/national

White supremacists frequently invoke various ideas of “pride” to defend their agendas, ideologies, and actions against people of color, women, disabled people, poor people, LGBTQ+ people, and leftists. However, their imagined society necessarily puts straight, white, cisgender, abled, and rich men at the top – either without oppressed groups or with oppressed peoples locked into their location of service.

“I have learned from making art about human frailty that white pride, and our acceptance of even mild versions of it as generalized pride in our country, is the greatest enemy of our ability as a nation to survive this latest inflection point in America’s democratic experiment.” -Gerard Bush

Table of Contents

Further Resources

Table of Contents

Contact us


Table of Contents